Assertion(A): The cotton industry in India suffered a major recession soon after the independence.
Reason(R) : Most of the cotton mills had gone to West Pakistan, India retaining the cotton growing areas.
Both Asseration and Reason are individually true and Reason is the correct explanation of Assertion
Both Assertion and Reason are individually true but Reason is NOT the correct explanation of Assertion
Assertion is true but Reason is false
Assertion is false but Reason is true
The correct Answer is:A
Related Playlists
Similar Questions
Assertion (A): The most dynamic industries in Britain were clearly Cotton and Metals.
Reason (R) : By 1873, Britain was exporting iron and steel worth about Rs 77 million, double the value of its cotton export.View SolutionGiven below are two statements, one is labelled as Assertion (A) and other as Reason (R ).
Assertion (A) : Marathas emerged as the strongest native power in India after the decline of Mughal Empier.
Reason (R ) : Marathas were the first rulers who had a clear concept of United Indian Nation.
Choose the correct answer from the code given below.View SolutionAssertion (A) : New England region in the U.S.A. continues to be an important areas for cotton textiles.
Reason (R) : Market and geographical inertia are the main reasons for cotton textiles here.
Codes:View SolutionAssertion (A): Khilafat Movement started in India after the Second World War.
Reason (R) : Gandhiji had been one of the Presidents of the All India Khilafat Conference.View SolutionAssertion (A) : First war of independence broke out in India in 1857 soon after the departure of Loard . Dalhousie from India .
Reason (R ) : Loard Dalhousie's annexationsit policy had caused great disconted.View SolutionTwo hundred years after Malthus predicted that population growth would overtake food production by a margin of 256 to 9, the simple fact is that food production had always been ahead of the population growth. Malthus' doomsday prediction simply did not come true due to two major reasons: first, population did not grow geometrically and birth rates in all Western countries fell during the 20th Century, resulting in very slow population growth. Over the past quarter century, birth rates have been falling in the developing countries too. Second, modern agricultural practices and better irrigation have resulted in tremendous growth in food production in almost all parts of the globe, with the notable exception of sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, at the global level, the Malthusian doomsday never befell on us.
India's population grew by about two and a half times in the past 45 years from 361 million in 1951 to an estimated 916 million in 1995. But during the same period, India's food-grain production grew by nearly four times - from 51 million tonnes in 1951 to 191 million tonnes in 1995. As a result, the per capita food grain availability in India has gone up considerably since the independence. That is, the Malthusian prediction has not come true even in India.
The food production had always been____ of population growth.View SolutionTwo hundred years after Malthus predicted that population growth would overtake food production by a margin of 256 to 9, the simple fact is that food production had always been ahead of the population growth. Malthus' doomsday prediction simply did not come true due to two major reasons: first, population did not grow geometrically and birth rates in all Western countries fell during the 20th Century, resulting in very slow population growth. Over the past quarter century, birth rates have been falling in the developing countries too. Second, modern agricultural practices and better irrigation have resulted in tremendous growth in food production in almost all parts of the globe, with the notable exception of sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, at the global level, the Malthusian doomsday never befell on us.
India's population grew by about two and a half times in the past 45 years from 361 million in 1951 to an estimated 916 million in 1995. But during the same period, India's food-grain production grew by nearly four times - from 51 million tonnes in 1951 to 191 million tonnes in 1995. As a result, the per capita food grain availability in India has gone up considerably since the independence. That is, the Malthusian prediction has not come true even in India.
In the developing countries, the birth rate isView SolutionTwo hundred years after Malthus predicted that population growth would overtake food production by a margin of 256 to 9, the simple fact is that food production had always been ahead of the population growth. Malthus' doomsday prediction simply did not come true due to two major reasons: first, population did not grow geometrically and birth rates in all Western countries fell during the 20th Century, resulting in very slow population growth. Over the past quarter century, birth rates have been falling in the developing countries too. Second, modern agricultural practices and better irrigation have resulted in tremendous growth in food production in almost all parts of the globe, with the notable exception of sub-Saharan Africa. Therefore, at the global level, the Malthusian doomsday never befell on us.
India's population grew by about two and a half times in the past 45 years from 361 million in 1951 to an estimated 916 million in 1995. But during the same period, India's food-grain production grew by nearly four times - from 51 million tonnes in 1951 to 191 million tonnes in 1995. As a result, the per capita food grain availability in India has gone up considerably since the independence. That is, the Malthusian prediction has not come true even in India.
In the past forty five years, India's population has grown aboutView SolutionGive reasons for the development of cotton textile industries in
India.View SolutionIn which two states in India has the cotton textile industry developed the most?
View Solution